106) In rejecting proportionality as a principle of fundamental justice in Malmo-Levine, the majority noted that it was concerned with maintaining consistency between Sections 7 and 12 and preserving the distinction between the analysis that takes places under Section 7 and the analysis that occurs under Section 1.
What does PFJ stand for?
PFJ stands for Principle of Fundamental Justice (law)
This definition appears somewhat frequently and is found in the following Acronym Finder categories:
- Organizations, NGOs, schools, universities, etc.
See other definitions of PFJ
We have 14 other meanings of PFJ in our Acronym Attic
- Peace Field Japan
- People's Front of Judea (Monty Python's movie Life of Brian)
- Phee Farrer Jones (media recruitment; UK)
- Photographers Federation of Japan
- Pierre Fabre Japon Co., Ltd. (Japan)
- Pioneers for Jesus
- Play for Jesus
- Polar Frontal Jet
- Prayer for Judgment (legal)
- Primed Finger Joint (molding)
- Pakistan Freelance Journalists Association
- Presbyterians for Just Immigration (Presbyterian Church USA; Louisville, KY)
- Patello-Femoral Joint Reaction
- Polifonica Friulana Jacopo Tomadini (Italian choir)
- Panhellenic Federation of Journalists' Union (Athens, Greece)
- Parents for Kids (education)
- Playing for Keeps (retail brand)
- Poulet Frit Kentucky (French: Kentucky Fried Chicken)
- Produce for Kids
Samples in periodicals archive:
He then provided some instructive ideas about what constitutes a principle of fundamental justice since BC Motor Vehicle.
The confessions rule is thus a natural candidate for recognition as a principle of fundamental justice under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The ongoing refusal of Canada to request Mr Khadr's repatriation to Canada offends a principle of fundamental justice and violates Mr Khadr's rights,'' Judge James O'Reilly said in a written judgment on Thursday in Toronto.
46) In this case, an applicable, identified principle of fundamental justice is that a law that affects the life, liberty, or security of the person cannot be arbitrary.
The Court stated, "The principle of fundamental justice at issue here is that young people are entitled to a presumption of diminished moral blameworthiness or culpability flowing from the fact that, because of their age, they have heightened vulnerability, less maturity, and a reduced capacity for moral judgment.
87) In Chaoulli, the Court clarified that it is a principle of fundamental justice that laws not be arbitrary and described the scope of the principle.
justices came up with five different interpretations of the principle of fundamental justice at issue.
In Malmo-Levine, (119) which challenged provisions prohibiting the possession of marijuana under the Narcotic Control Act, (120) the appellant suggested that the harm principle, according to which the absence of demonstrated harm to others deprived Parliament of the power to create a criminal law offence, should be recognized as a principle of fundamental justice for the purposes of section 7, independently from its recognition in the context of the division of powers.