[FIGURE 2 OMITTED] Indirect Effect of Latent Constructs We hypothesized that respondents who reported better interactions with providers also would have a better understanding of conditions and treatment options, and the results do suggest a strong positive link between these two constructs that is relatively uniform across illness complexity level (Figure 2).
What does CLEVEL stand for?
CLEVEL stands for Complexity Level (National Imagery Transmission Formats; MIL-STD-2500)
This definition appears somewhat frequently
- Abbreviation Database Surfer
- « Previous
- Next »
- Continuing Legal Education Training Program
- California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System
- Clearly Lacking Educational Testing, Utility, or Sense
- College Level Exam of Economic Understanding
- Consciousness Life Earth Universe
- Consolidated Law Enforcement Unit
- Certificate of Lawfulness of Existing Use or Development
- Culture Loisirs Entraide Voyages (French: Culture Leisure Mutual Travel)
- CyberLink Eagle Vision (PowerDVD)
- Cleveland (Ohio)
- Clinical Laboratory for Evaluation and Validation of Epidemiologic Research
- Compact Low Emission Vehicle for Urban Transport
- Camp Lejeune Energy from Wood (US EPA)
- Collaboration and Learning Environment (University of Windsor; Canada)
- Community Learning and Education Working Group (American Registry for Internet Numbers)
- Continuing Legal Education for Wisconsin (University of Wisconsin Law School; Madison, WI)
- Cost of Living Extremely Well Index
- Contact Lens Extended Wear Study (University of California Berkeley; test of durability of lenses; conducted 2000)
- Culture, Language, Elders and Youth (Department of; Nunavut, Canada)
- Cableless Linking Facility (traffic lights)
Samples in periodicals archive:
It includes guidelines for testing at some higher structural complexity levels, but focuses on material-level property characterization, and emphasizes statistical methods typically used for the determination of property values and the specific requirements for data published in the second volume of the handbook.
To identify assembly complexity level, a method introduced by Stig Oresjo (1) was used.
More than 130,000 users in 11,000 agencies of every size and complexity level use Applied Systems solutions built around insurance agency software TAM[R], Epic[TM], Vision[R], and DORIS[TM].
All training sessions included 12 trials of the deictic frames at the respective complexity level randomly presented to the child.
12, the required feature (PRF reports (porting)) is simple when upgrade requires only simple data porting, where as if PRF reports (porting) requires sorting and grouping, then complexity level is 3.