Advocate General Bot's said Thursday in an opinion in Case C-386/08 before Court of Justice of the European Communities, that products originating from the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) are not entitled to preferential customs treatment under the EC-Israel Agreement<p>"The Community customs authorities must refuse to recognise the Israeli origin of those products," he added.
Last month in a non-binding opinion, the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Communities said the Orams should demolish the house they built on land in Lapithos belonging to Greek Cypriot refugee Meletios Apostolides.
In this issue: The Supreme Court Precedent on Transfer of Undertaking and Termination of Employment Relationship The Court of Justice of the European Communities Judgment on the Nature and Transferability of a Social Benefit An Outlook on the Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on the Finnish Markets Stockholm District Court dismisses action brought by Swedish Competition Authority to block the merger between Copiax AB and Assa Abloy AB Revised Rules on Marketing to Consumers Enter into Force CORPORATE The Supreme Court Precedent on Transfer of Undertaking and Termination of Employment Relationship The Finnish Supreme Court has rendered a decision (KKO:2008:88, 17 September 2008) concerning employer's liability for termination of employment in connection with a transfer of undertaking.
As such it: has a general responsibility to ensure the Treaties' provisions are properly carried out; supervises the implementation of EU law by Member States; and where necessary, it must consider taking steps to remedy any breaches of EU law it identifies, ultimately, if necessary, by bringing an action against the offending Member State in the Court of Justice of the European Communities (commonly known as the "ECJ").
said Wednesday it has filed a complaint with the Court of Justice of the European Communities against a decision by the European Union (EU) to impose a fine of 24.
The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court states in the ruling (just as the Court of Justice of the European Communities did in June 2003) that the provisions on tax deductions for premiums paid under a occupational pension insurance policy (Sw: tjanstepensions-forsakring), requiring the insurance company to be established in Sweden, are not compatible with the rules concerning the freedom to provide services within the European Community (Article 49 of the EC Treaty).
